 |
| Dieziani Allison Madueke |
CONTROVERSY has erupted in the Federal Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Abuja, over the N1.1 billion paid to a contractor for the supply of a dive support sea-going vessel to the Federal Government-owned Petroleum Training Institute, PTI, Effurun, near Warri, Delta State.
The Auditor-General of the Federation, in a report, had recommended that the contractor should refund the money. In the report signed by the Director, Programme and Performance, Audit Department, Office of the Auditor General of the Federation, A.O. Ajao, said the money should be refunded “with interest to the Federal Government of Nigeria immediately.”
The fresh ripples in the ministry over the vessel, followed an order, last week, by the House of Representatives Committee on Petroleum Resources (Upstream), on the Minister of Petroleum Resources and the contractor to appear before it to explain the circumstances surrounding the payment of the money for a contract that was not performed.
Our source
said the facts of the contract swindle were not disclosed to the minister, as
some powerful officials of the ministry were involved in the deal.
The committee, led by Hon Ajibola Muraina,
decided the summon the minister and contractor when it became obvious that the
vessel, which had not been supplied to the institute, three years after it was
supposed to have been delivered, had allegedly attracted a demurrage of over
N600 million at $2,000 per day.
decided the summon the minister and contractor when it became obvious that the
vessel, which had not been supplied to the institute, three years after it was
supposed to have been delivered, had allegedly attracted a demurrage of over
N600 million at $2,000 per day.
Muraina said the Acting Principal/Chief
Executive of PTI, Mrs. Nnenna Dennar, informed the committee that the dive
support sea-going vessel was in the custody of the Nigerian Embassy at
Singapore, but information at the disposal of the National Assembly indicated
that the vessel might not even be in existence and the facts of its
non-existence had to be established.
Executive of PTI, Mrs. Nnenna Dennar, informed the committee that the dive
support sea-going vessel was in the custody of the Nigerian Embassy at
Singapore, but information at the disposal of the National Assembly indicated
that the vessel might not even be in existence and the facts of its
non-existence had to be established.
Members of the House committee, who were on an
oversight function, were taken aback when they were told that another N900
million was required to convert the vessel to a dive-support ship , almost the
equivalent of what was used to purchase the vessel itself.
oversight function, were taken aback when they were told that another N900
million was required to convert the vessel to a dive-support ship , almost the
equivalent of what was used to purchase the vessel itself.
It was obvious that the entire deal was between
the contractor and some persons in the Federal Ministry of Petroleum Resources,
Abuja, which awarded the contract in 2009, hence the committee decided to
summon the minister and contractor.
the contractor and some persons in the Federal Ministry of Petroleum Resources,
Abuja, which awarded the contract in 2009, hence the committee decided to
summon the minister and contractor.
“To us in the National Assembly, the vessel may
not be existing, if you are paying demurrage, it means you have taken delivery,
you have not taken ownership”, Muraina stated.
not be existing, if you are paying demurrage, it means you have taken delivery,
you have not taken ownership”, Muraina stated.
He said the committee was interested in knowing
the terms of the agreement between the contractor and PTI; at what point the
institute was supposed to have taken delivery of the vessel and what happened;
and the agents or consultant between the contractor and government .
the terms of the agreement between the contractor and PTI; at what point the
institute was supposed to have taken delivery of the vessel and what happened;
and the agents or consultant between the contractor and government .
Source:
Vanguard
Vanguard
